PortfoliosLab logo
ACU2.DE vs. IOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ACU2.DE and IOO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ACU2.DE vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACU2.DE:

0.30

IOO:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

ACU2.DE:

0.56

IOO:

0.86

Omega Ratio

ACU2.DE:

1.08

IOO:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

ACU2.DE:

0.26

IOO:

0.56

Martin Ratio

ACU2.DE:

0.81

IOO:

2.10

Ulcer Index

ACU2.DE:

7.64%

IOO:

5.08%

Daily Std Dev

ACU2.DE:

18.57%

IOO:

20.74%

Max Drawdown

ACU2.DE:

-34.31%

IOO:

-55.85%

Current Drawdown

ACU2.DE:

-12.08%

IOO:

-2.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACU2.DE achieves a -8.65% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU2.DE has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 11.44%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.


ACU2.DE

YTD

-8.65%

1M

6.85%

6M

-10.78%

1Y

5.55%

3Y*

9.96%

5Y*

13.83%

10Y*

11.44%

IOO

YTD

2.04%

1M

6.96%

6M

2.75%

1Y

12.19%

3Y*

15.24%

5Y*

16.78%

10Y*

12.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Global 100 ETF

ACU2.DE vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACU2.DE vs. IOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACU2.DE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACU2.DE is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACU2.DE is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACU2.DE is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACU2.DE is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACU2.DE is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACU2.DE is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IOO is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IOO is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IOO is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IOO is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IOO is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IOO is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACU2.DE vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACU2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACU2.DE and IOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ACU2.DE vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

ACU2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACU2.DE
Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
1.06%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%3.52%

Drawdowns

ACU2.DE vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU2.DE and IOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ACU2.DE vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 4.59%. This indicates that ACU2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...