ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE
ACU2.DE (Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR) and 5HED.DE (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ACU2.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while 5HED.DE tracks the Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACU2.DE returned 12.95%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for 5HED.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACU2.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5HED.DE.
Performance
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ACU2.DE is traded in EUR, while 5HED.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 5HED.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU2.DE achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly higher than 5HED.DE's -0.35% return.
ACU2.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
5HED.DE
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU2.DE Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR | 13.23% | 1.61% | 26.66% | 22.75% | -15.77% | 38.66% | 9.40% | 34.49% | -6.78% |
5HED.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) | -0.34% | -7.59% | 10.48% | 12.57% | -11.75% | 32.56% | 12.72% | 34.00% | -5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU2.DE and 5HED.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2018 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACU2.DE and 5HED.DE has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ACU2.DE
5HED.DE
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACU2.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.06 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 0.51 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 1.27 | +7.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACU2.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.30 | +1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.21 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.48 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU2.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than 5HED.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU2.DE and 5HED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU2.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -32.31% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -6.99% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -21.72% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -21.72% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.82% | +11.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -6.47% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.81% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) is 3.21%, while Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that ACU2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5HED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU2.DE | 5HED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 3.80% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 8.59% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 11.79% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 15.58% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.50% | -1.26% |
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACU2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than 5HED.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACU2.DE vs. 5HED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACU2.DE nor 5HED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU2.DE and 5HED.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACU2.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACU2.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.
ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while 5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ACU2.DE and 0.75% for 5HED.DE.
Find the right allocation for ACU2.DE and 5HED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer