PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and Ossiam US Minimum Variance ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) (OSX2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
5HED.DE
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
-2.67%4.29%4.19%16.05%-16.59%22.07%23.80%31.15%-7.82%
OSX2.DE
Ossiam US Minimum Variance ESG UCITS ETF (EUR)
0.00%7.93%14.77%1.68%-6.48%16.68%4.31%24.64%-2.25%
Different Trading Currencies

5HED.DE is traded in USD, while OSX2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the OSX2.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


5HED.DE

1D
1.43%
1M
-6.75%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*

OSX2.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HED.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OSX2.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HED.DE
5HED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

OSX2.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and Ossiam US Minimum Variance ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) (OSX2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5HED.DEOSX2.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.06

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5HED.DEOSX2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Correlation

The correlation between 5HED.DE and OSX2.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HED.DE nor OSX2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


5HED.DEOSX2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

Volatility

5HED.DE vs. OSX2.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


5HED.DEOSX2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%