PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACTHX vs. NHMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACTHX achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than NHMAX's 3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ACTHX has underperformed NHMAX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while NHMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.47% annualized return.


ACTHX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.93%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.79%

NHMAX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.30%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.75%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
2.64%4.38%5.54%4.34%-13.94%6.29%3.25%10.12%1.44%9.10%
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
3.09%2.98%5.36%6.96%-15.14%9.71%3.03%11.96%1.79%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTHX and NHMAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 1999

0.77

The correlation between ACTHX and NHMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACTHX vs. NHMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACTHX
ACTHX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ACTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ACTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NHMAX
NHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACTHXNHMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.74

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

8.14

+0.24

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the NHMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACTHX and NHMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACTHXNHMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.20

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.14

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.52

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.85

+0.25

Drawdowns

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACTHX drawdown since its inception was -27.29%, smaller than the maximum NHMAX drawdown of -45.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTHX and NHMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACTHXNHMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.29%

-45.60%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-3.58%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-10.58%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-21.65%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.83%

-22.22%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-5.49%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.20%

-0.28%

Volatility

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) is 1.40%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A (NHMAX) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that ACTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACTHXNHMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.54%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

3.13%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

4.48%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

6.83%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.39%

6.70%

-1.31%

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTHX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NHMAX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACTHX vs. NHMAX - Dividend Comparison

ACTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than NHMAX's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
5.34%7.14%5.64%4.22%4.72%3.95%4.33%4.70%4.78%4.71%5.11%4.93%
NHMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
5.87%6.30%5.54%7.10%5.41%4.49%4.83%4.77%5.26%5.20%5.61%5.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ACTHX and NHMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NHMAX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to ACTHX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACTHX dropped -27.29% vs NHMAX's -45.60%.

NHMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACTHX and NHMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer