ACSV vs. VBR
ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ACSV is actively managed, while VBR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
ACSV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 12.51% return.
ACSV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBR
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
ACSV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 14.95% | 2.82% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.51% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSV and VBR is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
ACSV
VBR
ACSV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSV | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | 0.42 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
ACSV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSV | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -61.98% | +54.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -8.27% | +6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.50% | — |
Volatility
ACSV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSV | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 15.14% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 19.77% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 21.73% | -5.81% |
ACSV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VBR's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 0.52% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ACSV and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.52% for ACSV.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.05% for VBR.
Find the right allocation for ACSV and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer