ACSV vs. FLV
ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while FLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for FLV.
Performance
ACSV vs. FLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly higher than FLV's 7.59% return.
ACSV
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 19.42%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLV
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSV vs. FLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 19.42% | 0.92% |
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 7.59% | 3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSV and FLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSV vs. FLV — Risk / Return Rank
ACSV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLV
ACSV vs. FLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSV | FLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSV vs. FLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum FLV drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and FLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSV | FLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -15.06% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -1.00% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -2.72% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility
ACSV vs. FLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSV | FLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 10.24% | +6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 12.70% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 14.27% | +1.97% |
ACSV vs. FLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLV's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSV vs. FLV - Dividend Comparison
ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than FLV's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 0.83% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSV and FLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.
FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.83% for ACSV.
ACSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FLV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.42% for FLV.
Find the right allocation for ACSV and FLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer