PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSNX vs. TWCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Short Duration Fund (ACSNX) and American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSNX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than TWCGX's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ACSNX has underperformed TWCGX with an annualized return of 2.32%, while TWCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.03% annualized return.


ACSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
2.32%

TWCGX

1D
-0.51%
1M
7.77%
YTD
8.57%
6M
7.58%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
17.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACSNX
American Century Short Duration Fund
0.86%5.65%4.69%4.72%-4.68%0.97%4.03%3.95%1.35%1.42%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
8.57%15.28%26.20%43.31%-31.39%27.86%35.23%35.39%-1.27%30.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSNX and TWCGX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2006

-0.07

The correlation between ACSNX and TWCGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSNX vs. TWCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSNX
ACSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ACSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TWCGX
TWCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TWCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Short Duration Fund (ACSNX) and American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACSNXTWCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.31

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.66

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.48

5.50

+8.98

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the TWCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSNX and TWCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACSNXTWCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.76

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.62

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.22

0.80

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.53

+0.85

Drawdowns

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSNX drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum TWCGX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSNX and TWCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSNXTWCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-59.60%

+53.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.21%

-16.69%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.21%

-24.20%

+22.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.50%

-34.92%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.50%

-34.92%

+28.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.51%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-15.30%

+14.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

5.01%

-4.72%

Volatility

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Short Duration Fund (ACSNX) is 0.61%, while American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that ACSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSNXTWCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

3.44%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

11.92%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

15.72%

-13.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

21.59%

-19.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.91%

21.31%

-19.40%

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSNX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than TWCGX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSNX vs. TWCGX - Dividend Comparison

ACSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than TWCGX's 15.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACSNX
American Century Short Duration Fund
4.38%4.55%4.56%3.96%1.60%1.74%1.51%2.59%2.53%1.91%1.62%1.73%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
15.79%17.14%5.96%4.81%4.86%9.83%5.33%5.60%14.07%10.28%4.64%6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSNX and TWCGX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWCGX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to ACSNX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSNX dropped -6.50% vs TWCGX's -59.60%.

ACSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSNX and TWCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer