ACSI vs. OILK
ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACSI returned 9.12%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
ACSI vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
ACSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 9.66% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 24.88% | -4.97% | 15.77% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSI and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ACSI and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACSI vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACSI
OILK
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACSI
OILK
Communication Services
ACSI
OILK
-
Technology
ACSI
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
ACSI
OILK
-
Financial Services
ACSI
OILK
-
Healthcare
ACSI
OILK
-
Industrials
ACSI
OILK
-
Utilities
ACSI
OILK
-
Energy
ACSI
OILK
-
Basic Materials
ACSI
-
OILK
-
Real Estate
ACSI
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSI vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
ACSI
OILK
ACSI vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSI | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.42 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 6.91 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSI | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.06 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.12 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
ACSI vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSI | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -83.76% | +49.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -17.35% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | -23.42% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -34.69% | +9.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -3.66% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -32.61% | +27.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 8.56% | -6.58% |
Volatility
ACSI vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 4.16%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSI | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 10.44% | -6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 23.26% | -14.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 28.75% | -17.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 30.12% | -13.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 35.97% | -18.54% |
ACSI vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSI vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSI and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ACSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.83% for ACSI.
ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSI and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer