PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSI vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSI vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


ACSI

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.55%
YTD
9.66%
6M
9.77%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSI vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
9.66%10.70%22.51%21.06%-20.93%23.33%22.93%24.88%-4.97%15.77%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSI and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016

0.15

The correlation between ACSI and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACSI vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACSI
OILK

Consumer Cyclical

24.2%
100.0%

Communication Services

15.4%

-

Technology

12.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.4%

-

Financial Services

9.6%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

7.3%

-

Utilities

3.9%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ACSI
24.2%
OILK
100.0%

Communication Services

ACSI
15.4%
OILK

-

Technology

ACSI
12.5%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

ACSI
12.4%
OILK

-

Financial Services

ACSI
9.6%
OILK

-

Healthcare

ACSI
8.5%
OILK

-

Industrials

ACSI
7.3%
OILK

-

Utilities

ACSI
3.9%
OILK

-

Energy

ACSI
3.4%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

ACSI

-

OILK

-

Real Estate

ACSI

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSI vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI
ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSI vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACSIOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.42

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

6.91

+2.54

ACSI vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSI and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACSIOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.06

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.59

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.12

+0.63

Drawdowns

ACSI vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSIOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-83.76%

+49.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-17.35%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-23.42%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-34.69%

+9.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-3.66%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-32.61%

+27.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

8.56%

-6.58%

Volatility

ACSI vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 4.16%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSIOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

10.44%

-6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

23.26%

-14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

28.75%

-17.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

30.12%

-13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

35.97%

-18.54%

ACSI vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSI vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
0.83%0.91%0.69%1.01%0.81%0.31%0.82%1.64%1.59%1.20%0.18%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSI and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ACSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 9.12% for ACSI. On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.83% for ACSI.

ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSI and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer