ACSI vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ACSI returned 21.68% vs 3397.63% for MUU. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

ACSI vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 640.02% return.

ACSI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.49%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 9.50%
• 1M: -10.60%
• 6M: 441.55%
• YTD: 640.02%
• 1Y: 3,397.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSI vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	14.72%	10.70%	5.56%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	640.02%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSI and MUU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.28

Return for Risk

ACSI vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 72
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSI vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACSI	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	29.47	-27.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	5.90	-3.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.73	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	81.19	-78.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	269.76	-258.96

ACSI vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 29.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSI and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACSI vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSI	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-75.07%	+40.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	-52.72%	+44.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-30.27%	+30.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-23.44%	+18.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	16.68%	-14.66%

Volatility

ACSI vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 3.11%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.96%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACSI	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	67.96%	-64.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	115.39%	-106.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	145.68%	-134.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	138.08%	-121.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	138.08%	-120.71%

ACSI vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSI vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.64%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSI and MUU in my portfolio?

ACSI and MUU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACSI or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.96%) compared to ACSI (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, ACSI or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3397.63% vs 21.68% for ACSI. On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACSI or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3397.63% return vs 21.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSI or MUU?

ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSI or MUU?

ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.

What is the main difference between ACSI and MUU?

ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (29.47 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.