PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSI vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSI vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.


ACSI

1D
0.61%
1M
2.03%
YTD
10.57%
6M
10.67%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSI vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
10.57%10.70%22.51%8.75%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSI and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.04

The correlation between ACSI and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSI vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI
ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSI vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACSIIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.22

-0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

16.56

-14.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

58.67

-48.89

ACSI vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSI and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACSI vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSIIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-0.90%

-33.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-0.27%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-0.08%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-0.10%

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.08%

+1.93%

Volatility

ACSI vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that ACSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSIIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

0.17%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

0.67%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

0.89%

+10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

1.56%

+15.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

1.56%

+15.84%

ACSI vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSI vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ACSI
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
0.83%0.91%0.69%1.01%0.81%0.31%0.82%1.64%1.59%1.20%0.18%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSI and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACSI has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, ACSI leads with 19.62% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ACSI has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.83% for ACSI.

ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSI and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer