ACSI vs. GQGU

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ACSI is passively managed, while GQGU is actively managed. Over the past year, ACSI returned 21.68% vs 4.74% for GQGU. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.

Performance

ACSI vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 5.95% return.

ACSI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.49%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: 6.34%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSI vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	14.72%	6.28%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	5.95%	-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSI and GQGU is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

ACSI vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 72
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GQGU

GQGU Risk / Return Rank: 17
GQGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
GQGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GQGU Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GQGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GQGU Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSI vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACSI	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	0.44	+1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	0.71	+1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.08	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	0.57	+2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	1.38	+9.42

ACSI vs. GQGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the GQGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACSI and GQGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACSI vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSI	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-8.41%	-26.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	-8.41%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.24%	+5.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-2.89%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	3.45%	-1.43%

Volatility

ACSI vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 3.11%, while GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACSI	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	4.59%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	8.53%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	10.72%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	10.72%	+5.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	10.72%	+6.65%

ACSI vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSI vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.96%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSI and GQGU in my portfolio?

ACSI and GQGU have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACSI or GQGU?

GQGU has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to ACSI (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs GQGU's -8.41%.

Which ETF is better, ACSI or GQGU?

On 1-year performance, ACSI leads with 21.68% vs 4.74% for GQGU. On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACSI or GQGU?

Over the 1-year period, ACSI has performed better with a 21.68% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSI or GQGU?

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSI or GQGU?

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.80% for ACSI.

What is the main difference between ACSI and GQGU?

They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.49% for GQGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.