PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSG vs. QGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSG vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSG achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 0.82% return.


ACSG

1D
0.91%
1M
4.36%
YTD
20.88%
6M
17.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QGRO

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
0.82%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSG vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACSG and QGRO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.85

ACSG vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACSG
QGRO

Technology

26.1%
43.5%

Industrials

22.4%
10.6%

Healthcare

21.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.4%

Financial Services

7.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.8%
0.2%

Energy

2.8%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.5%

Utilities

2.0%
2.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
14.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.8%

Technology

ACSG
26.1%
QGRO
43.5%

Industrials

ACSG
22.4%
QGRO
10.6%

Healthcare

ACSG
21.2%
QGRO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ACSG
8.2%
QGRO
8.4%

Financial Services

ACSG
7.6%
QGRO
3.9%

Basic Materials

ACSG
3.8%
QGRO
0.2%

Energy

ACSG
2.8%
QGRO
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

ACSG
2.4%
QGRO
3.5%

Utilities

ACSG
2.0%
QGRO
2.5%

Communication Services

ACSG
1.9%
QGRO
14.0%

Real Estate

ACSG
1.8%
QGRO
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSG vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSG vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACSGQGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

ACSG vs. QGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACSG vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSG drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSG and QGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSGQGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-32.56%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-2.53%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-7.63%

+4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

Volatility

ACSG vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSGQGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.85%

15.92%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

21.17%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.85%

22.92%

-0.07%

ACSG vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSG vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ACSG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QGRO
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.19%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSG and QGRO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.

QGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.

ACSG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSG and 0.29% for QGRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSG and QGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer