PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSG vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSG vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSG achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 18.85% return.


ACSG

1D
-3.92%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
11.29%
6M
9.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVLV

1D
-1.74%
1M
1.68%
YTD
18.85%
6M
19.67%
1Y
37.43%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSG vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACSG and AVLV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025

0.81

ACSG vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACSG
AVLV

Industrials

23.4%
15.4%

Healthcare

22.7%
5.6%

Technology

22.0%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
14.1%

Financial Services

7.6%
16.3%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.0%

Energy

3.1%
14.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
6.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
7.7%

Utilities

1.7%
0.3%

Industrials

ACSG
23.4%
AVLV
15.4%

Healthcare

ACSG
22.7%
AVLV
5.6%

Technology

ACSG
22.0%
AVLV
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ACSG
9.1%
AVLV
14.1%

Financial Services

ACSG
7.6%
AVLV
16.3%

Basic Materials

ACSG
3.9%
AVLV
2.0%

Energy

ACSG
3.1%
AVLV
14.4%

Communication Services

ACSG
2.2%
AVLV
6.9%

Real Estate

ACSG
2.2%
AVLV
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ACSG
2.0%
AVLV
7.7%

Utilities

ACSG
1.7%
AVLV
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSG vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSG

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSG vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACSG vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACSGAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.84

+0.08

Drawdowns

ACSG vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSG drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum AVLV drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSG and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSGAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-19.50%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-1.74%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-3.93%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

ACSG vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSGAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

12.40%

+10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

17.36%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

17.36%

+5.19%

ACSG vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSG vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ACSG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.08%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSG and AVLV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.

AVLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.

ACSG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSG and 0.15% for AVLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSG and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer