ACSG vs. AVES
ACSG (American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF) and AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVES.
Performance
ACSG vs. AVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSG achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's 12.08% return.
ACSG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVES
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACSG vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSG American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF | 20.88% | -0.86% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 12.08% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSG and AVES is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSG vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank
ACSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVES
ACSG vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSG | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSG vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSG drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum AVES drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSG and AVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSG | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -27.40% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -5.70% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -7.67% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility
ACSG vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSG | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.85% | 18.87% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 17.34% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 17.34% | +5.51% |
ACSG vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSG vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison
ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSG American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.49% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSG and AVES have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.
AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.
ACSG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSG and 0.36% for AVES.
Find the right allocation for ACSG and AVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer