ACRNX vs. IMIDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX).
ACRNX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 10, 1970. IMIDX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | -9.00% | 4.80% | 14.46% | 21.85% | -33.80% | 8.62% | 29.65% | 26.65% | -8.82% | 25.22% |
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.83% | -4.88% | 18.11% | 16.29% | -26.94% | 29.42% | 30.57% | 42.36% | -4.98% | 15.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than IMIDX's -2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ACRNX has underperformed IMIDX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while IMIDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.
ACRNX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -12.92%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
IMIDX
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than IMIDX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACRNX vs. IMIDX — Risk / Return Rank
ACRNX
IMIDX
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACRNX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.17 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 0.39 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.14 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 0.35 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACRNX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.17 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.11 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.49 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACRNX and IMIDX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Dividend Comparison
ACRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 26.17% | 13.28% | 11.43% | 8.55% | 23.63% | 39.09% | 63.48% |
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.66% | 13.27% | 27.75% | 6.27% | 5.80% | 12.29% | 2.06% | 10.80% | 2.99% | 0.04% | 1.11% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than IMIDX's maximum drawdown of -35.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and IMIDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACRNX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -35.15% | -21.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -12.10% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.58% | -34.88% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -35.15% | -10.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.25% | -13.30% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -7.26% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 4.64% | -0.17% |
Volatility
ACRNX vs. IMIDX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) at 6.85%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACRNX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 6.85% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 13.52% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 20.45% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 21.12% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 20.93% | +1.95% |