ACRNX vs. COSZX
ACRNX (Columbia Acorn Fund) and COSZX (Columbia Overseas Value Fund) are both mutual funds - ACRNX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Columbia, while COSZX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, ACRNX returned 10.43%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for COSZX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACRNX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for COSZX.
Performance
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a 20.40% return, which is significantly higher than COSZX's 1.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACRNX having a 10.43% annualized return and COSZX not far ahead at 10.52%.
ACRNX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 20.40%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 34.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
COSZX
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | 20.40% | 4.80% | 14.46% | 21.85% | -33.80% | 8.62% | 29.65% | 26.65% | -8.82% | 25.78% |
COSZX Columbia Overseas Value Fund | 1.13% | 45.80% | 4.70% | 16.05% | -5.99% | 10.78% | -0.07% | 22.37% | -16.70% | 27.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACRNX and COSZX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008 | 0.69 |
The correlation between ACRNX and COSZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACRNX vs. COSZX — Risk / Return Rank
ACRNX
COSZX
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACRNX | COSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.74 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 5.64 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum COSZX drawdown of -63.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and COSZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACRNX | COSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -63.37% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -11.76% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.05% | -13.34% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.58% | -25.77% | -19.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -43.40% | -2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.14% | +10.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -17.86% | +9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 3.63% | +0.75% |
Volatility
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX) at 6.22%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACRNX | COSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 6.22% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 12.38% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 14.85% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 16.01% | +9.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 17.46% | +5.71% |
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than COSZX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACRNX vs. COSZX - Dividend Comparison
ACRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than COSZX's 7.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 26.17% | 13.28% | 11.43% | 8.55% | 24.10% | 39.09% | 63.48% |
COSZX Columbia Overseas Value Fund | 7.82% | 7.91% | 5.38% | 3.97% | 1.88% | 3.59% | 1.69% | 3.82% | 3.59% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACRNX and COSZX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACRNX has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to COSZX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACRNX dropped -56.70% vs COSZX's -63.37%.
ACRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACRNX and COSZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer