COSZX vs. MFWTX
COSZX (Columbia Overseas Value Fund) and MFWTX (MFS Global Total Return Fund) are both mutual funds - COSZX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Columbia, while MFWTX is a Global Allocation fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, COSZX returned 10.52%/yr vs 6.44%/yr for MFWTX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COSZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for MFWTX.
Performance
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COSZX achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than MFWTX's 4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, COSZX has outperformed MFWTX with an annualized return of 10.52%, while MFWTX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.44% annualized return.
COSZX
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
MFWTX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COSZX Columbia Overseas Value Fund | 1.13% | 45.80% | 4.70% | 16.05% | -5.99% | 10.78% | -0.07% | 22.37% | -16.70% | 27.82% |
MFWTX MFS Global Total Return Fund | 4.62% | 15.48% | 3.92% | 10.29% | -10.86% | 8.31% | 9.35% | 18.25% | -7.19% | 14.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between COSZX and MFWTX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008 | 0.88 |
The correlation between COSZX and MFWTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COSZX vs. MFWTX — Risk / Return Rank
COSZX
MFWTX
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COSZX | MFWTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.97 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 6.93 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSZX drawdown since its inception was -63.37%, which is greater than MFWTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSZX and MFWTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSZX | MFWTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.37% | -33.22% | -30.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -6.72% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.34% | -8.68% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.77% | -20.36% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.40% | -23.37% | -20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -1.73% | -8.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -3.55% | -14.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 1.90% | +1.73% |
Volatility
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) at 2.21%. This indicates that COSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COSZX | MFWTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 2.21% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 5.90% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 7.58% | +7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 9.14% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 9.63% | +7.83% |
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COSZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than MFWTX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
COSZX vs. MFWTX - Dividend Comparison
COSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, less than MFWTX's 8.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COSZX Columbia Overseas Value Fund | 7.82% | 7.91% | 5.38% | 3.97% | 1.88% | 3.59% | 1.69% | 3.82% | 3.59% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.27% |
MFWTX MFS Global Total Return Fund | 8.04% | 8.42% | 8.94% | 3.69% | 2.64% | 10.29% | 7.20% | 4.41% | 3.33% | 2.17% | 1.13% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COSZX and MFWTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COSZX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to MFWTX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSZX dropped -63.37% vs MFWTX's -33.22%.
MFWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COSZX and MFWTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer