PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACRNX vs. CDDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a 20.40% return, which is significantly higher than CDDYX's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ACRNX has underperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.


ACRNX

1D
1.03%
1M
8.34%
YTD
20.40%
6M
17.36%
1Y
34.34%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
10.43%

CDDYX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.39%
YTD
8.90%
6M
8.26%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACRNX
Columbia Acorn Fund
20.40%4.80%14.46%21.85%-33.80%8.62%29.65%26.65%-8.82%25.78%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.90%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ACRNX and CDDYX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012

0.75

The correlation between ACRNX and CDDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACRNX vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACRNX
ACRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ACRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ACRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACRNXCDDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.93

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

14.84

-6.66

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACRNX and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and CDDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACRNXCDDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-32.74%

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-5.51%

-11.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.05%

-12.99%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.58%

-16.91%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

-32.74%

-12.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.04%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-2.76%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

1.46%

+2.92%

Volatility

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.65%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACRNXCDDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

2.65%

+5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.33%

6.89%

+10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

9.17%

+12.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.19%

13.27%

+11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

15.69%

+7.48%

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACRNX vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

ACRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CDDYX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACRNX
Columbia Acorn Fund
0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.30%26.17%13.28%11.43%8.55%24.10%39.09%63.48%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.94%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACRNX and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACRNX has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to CDDYX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACRNX dropped -56.70% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

CDDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACRNX and CDDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer