ACN vs. BHP
ACN (Accenture plc) and BHP (BHP Group Limited) are both stocks. ACN operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while BHP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ACN returned 5.50%/yr vs 23.18%/yr for BHP. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACN vs. BHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACN achieves a -35.62% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 53.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ACN has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 5.50%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 23.18% annualized return.
ACN
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- -35.62%
- 6M
- -36.39%
- 1Y
- -43.95%
- 3Y*
- -16.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
BHP
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 53.40%
- 6M
- 55.28%
- 1Y
- 94.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
ACN vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACN Accenture plc | -35.62% | -22.14% | 1.86% | 33.60% | -34.75% | 60.67% | 26.04% | 51.21% | -6.23% | 33.34% |
BHP BHP Group Limited | 53.40% | 28.91% | -24.64% | 16.50% | 44.34% | 0.91% | 25.37% | 24.50% | 10.55% | 33.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACN and BHP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2001 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACN and BHP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ACN:
$106.02B
BHP:
$231.09B
ACN:
$12.27
BHP:
$8.51
ACN:
13.88
BHP:
10.67
ACN:
1.89
BHP:
2.95
ACN:
1.48
BHP:
2.15
ACN:
3.40
BHP:
4.58
ACN:
$72.11B
BHP:
$107.64B
ACN:
$23.06B
BHP:
$89.04B
ACN:
$12.11B
BHP:
$52.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACN vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank
ACN
BHP
ACN vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accenture plc (ACN) and BHP Group Limited (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACN | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.42 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 4.57 | -5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | 16.96 | -18.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACN vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACN drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACN and BHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACN | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.20% | -76.22% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.89% | -19.80% | -28.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.67% | -37.21% | -21.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.67% | -37.21% | -21.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.67% | -44.29% | -14.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.91% | -2.50% | -53.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.89% | -21.28% | +8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.93% | 5.38% | +21.55% |
Volatility
ACN vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Accenture plc (ACN) is 12.95%, while BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a volatility of 13.72%. This indicates that ACN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACN | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.95% | 13.72% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.81% | 26.69% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.02% | 32.39% | +3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.60% | 32.44% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 32.34% | -5.47% |
Dividends
ACN vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison
ACN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than BHP's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACN Accenture plc | 3.74% | 2.26% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 0.87% | 1.26% | 1.07% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.97% | 2.03% |
BHP BHP Group Limited | 2.93% | 3.64% | 5.98% | 4.98% | 22.44% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.38% |
Financials
ACN vs. BHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Accenture plc and BHP Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACN vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison
ACN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported a gross profit of 5.46B and revenue of 18.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.3%.
BHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
ACN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 18.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.
BHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.
ACN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accenture plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 18.04B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
BHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACN and BHP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BHP has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to ACN (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACN dropped -59.20% vs BHP's -76.22%.
BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACN and BHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer