ACMVX vs. NCBVX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX).
ACMVX is managed by American Century. It was launched on Mar 31, 2004. NCBVX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Aug 19, 1998.
Performance
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACMVX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.93% | 8.77% | 8.50% | 6.18% | -1.34% | 23.41% | 1.63% | 28.89% | -12.63% | 11.57% |
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund | 4.82% | 11.86% | 10.49% | 10.40% | -10.18% | 33.13% | -7.31% | 18.78% | -20.51% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACMVX achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than NCBVX's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ACMVX has outperformed NCBVX with an annualized return of 8.94%, while NCBVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.05% annualized return.
ACMVX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 13.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
NCBVX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACMVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NCBVX's 1.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACMVX vs. NCBVX — Risk / Return Rank
ACMVX
NCBVX
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACMVX | NCBVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.08 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 1.58 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.56 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 7.29 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACMVX | NCBVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.08 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.31 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACMVX and NCBVX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Dividend Comparison
ACMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.98%, more than NCBVX's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACMVX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund | 13.98% | 14.46% | 8.76% | 5.24% | 15.00% | 15.95% | 1.83% | 1.46% | 14.51% | 9.49% | 4.05% | 11.06% |
NCBVX PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund | 0.65% | 0.68% | 1.03% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 0.74% | 1.60% | 1.93% | 13.70% | 6.69% | 2.83% | 7.89% |
Drawdowns
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACMVX drawdown since its inception was -51.19%, smaller than the maximum NCBVX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACMVX and NCBVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACMVX | NCBVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.19% | -60.64% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -6.31% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.46% | -23.15% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.24% | -57.50% | +18.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -3.24% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -9.15% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.92% | +0.10% |
Volatility
ACMVX vs. NCBVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX) is 4.07%, while PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Value Fund (NCBVX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that ACMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCBVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACMVX | NCBVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.04% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 9.85% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 18.48% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 18.85% | -4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 22.67% | -5.22% |