ACLO vs. PWRD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. ACLO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.

Performance

ACLO vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than PWRD's 19.81% return.

ACLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWRD

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 19.81%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLO vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.21%	2.70%
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	19.81%	7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLO and PWRD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

ACLO vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLO vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACLO	PWRD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	7.29	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	14.85	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.41	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	19.90	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	164.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACLO	PWRD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.10	1.32	+3.78

Drawdowns

ACLO vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum PWRD drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and PWRD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACLO	PWRD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.01%	-14.12%	+13.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.74%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-3.17%	+3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACLO	PWRD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73%	24.03%	-23.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.08%	24.03%	-22.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.08%	24.03%	-22.95%

ACLO vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACLO vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.91%	4.87%	0.59%
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACLO and PWRD in my portfolio?

ACLO and PWRD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACLO or PWRD?

On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACLO or PWRD?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACLO or PWRD?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.

What is the main difference between ACLO and PWRD?

ACLO is categorized as CLO, while PWRD is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 0.75% for PWRD.