ACLC vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACLC is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACLC returned 9.98%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

ACLC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.33% return.

ACLC

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 5.55%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 15.94%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF	5.55%	11.80%	19.96%	24.74%	-19.37%	28.97%	17.02%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	7.33%	17.77%	24.89%	27.20%	-19.46%	27.13%	19.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLC and BBUS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020	0.98

The correlation between ACLC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACLC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLC

ACLC Risk / Return Rank: 38
ACLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ACLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ACLC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ACLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ACLC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 53
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACLC	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.62	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.24	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.20	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.66	9.56	-2.90

ACLC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACLC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACLC	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.44%	-35.35%	+8.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.28%	-9.21%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.49%	-19.01%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.44%	-25.46%	-0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-3.68%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-5.43%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	2.11%	+0.29%

Volatility

ACLC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACLC	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	4.85%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	9.86%	+0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	12.49%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	17.13%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	19.58%	-2.46%

ACLC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACLC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than BBUS's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF	0.55%	0.64%	0.89%	1.09%	1.10%	0.72%	0.43%	0.00%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	1.04%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACLC and BBUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ACLC and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACLC or BBUS?

BBUS has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to ACLC (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLC dropped -26.44% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, ACLC or BBUS?

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.39% vs 9.98% for ACLC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, ACLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACLC or BBUS?

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACLC or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACLC or BBUS?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.55% for ACLC.

What is the main difference between ACLC and BBUS?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.