ACIO vs. OILK
ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. ACIO is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACIO returned 10.18%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACIO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
ACIO vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
ACIO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ACIO vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 7.22% | 9.03% | 21.92% | 15.90% | -10.31% | 18.03% | 9.85% | 3.32% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACIO and OILK is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ACIO and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACIO vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACIO
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ACIO
OILK
-
Financial Services
ACIO
OILK
-
Communication Services
ACIO
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACIO
OILK
Healthcare
ACIO
OILK
-
Industrials
ACIO
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
ACIO
OILK
-
Energy
ACIO
OILK
-
Utilities
ACIO
OILK
-
Real Estate
ACIO
OILK
-
Basic Materials
ACIO
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACIO vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
ACIO
OILK
ACIO vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACIO | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.42 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 6.91 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACIO | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.06 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.59 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.12 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
ACIO vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACIO | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -83.76% | +69.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -17.35% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | -23.42% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | -34.69% | +20.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -3.66% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -32.61% | +29.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 8.56% | -6.76% |
Volatility
ACIO vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is 2.18%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ACIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACIO | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 10.44% | -8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.13% | 23.26% | -17.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 28.75% | -20.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 30.12% | -19.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 35.97% | -24.33% |
ACIO vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACIO vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.72% | 1.51% | 0.61% | 1.02% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACIO and OILK have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ACIO (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIO dropped -14.19% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 10.18% for ACIO. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ACIO has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.38% for ACIO.
ACIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACIO and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACIO and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer