ACIO vs. OCTB
ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while OCTB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACIO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.
Performance
ACIO vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than OCTB's 5.52% return.
ACIO
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 13.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTB
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACIO vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 5.06% | 0.65% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 5.52% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACIO and OCTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACIO vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank
ACIO
OCTB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACIO vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACIO | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACIO vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and OCTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACIO | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -4.79% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -0.82% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -0.69% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | — | — |
Volatility
ACIO vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACIO | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 7.26% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 7.26% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 7.26% | +4.41% |
ACIO vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACIO vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison
ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 0.39% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.72% | 1.51% | 0.61% | 1.02% | 1.32% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ACIO and OCTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.
ACIO has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.
ACIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while OCTB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACIO and 0.25% for OCTB.
Find the right allocation for ACIO and OCTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer