PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACIO vs. DVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACIO vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 4.76% return.


ACIO

1D
-0.93%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.31%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

DVOL

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
YTD
4.76%
6M
3.40%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIO vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ACIO
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF
5.06%9.03%21.92%15.90%-10.31%18.03%9.85%3.30%
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
4.76%4.30%24.84%5.39%-16.10%30.08%11.15%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIO and DVOL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2019

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between ACIO and DVOL has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACIO vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIO
ACIO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ACIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIO vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACIODVOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.54

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.11

1.87

+5.24

ACIO vs. DVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the DVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIO and DVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACIO vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and DVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIODVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-38.26%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-9.82%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-11.66%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.00%

-24.65%

+10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-1.90%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-7.14%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.82%

-0.96%

Volatility

ACIO vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 3.36%. This indicates that ACIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACIODVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.36%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

9.50%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

11.87%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

14.40%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.67%

17.68%

-6.01%

ACIO vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACIO vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison

ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than DVOL's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ACIO
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF
0.39%0.37%0.44%0.72%1.51%0.61%1.02%1.32%0.00%
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.66%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACIO and DVOL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIO has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to DVOL (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIO dropped -14.19% vs DVOL's -38.26%.

On 5-year performance, ACIO leads with 9.65% vs 7.45% for DVOL. On fees, DVOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ACIO has performed better with a 9.65% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.

DVOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.39% for ACIO.

ACIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DVOL is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACIO and 0.60% for DVOL.

ACIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACIO and DVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer