PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACINX vs. SMGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACINX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than SMGIX's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ACINX has underperformed SMGIX with an annualized return of 4.52%, while SMGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.78% annualized return.


ACINX

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.85%
YTD
7.64%
6M
8.83%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
4.52%

SMGIX

1D
0.05%
1M
6.24%
YTD
10.46%
6M
10.80%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACINX
Columbia Acorn International Fund
7.64%12.52%-6.57%19.57%-33.64%12.92%15.15%29.84%-18.35%31.20%
SMGIX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund
10.46%17.35%23.33%32.12%-18.64%24.18%22.21%32.95%-8.95%20.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ACINX and SMGIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1993

0.59

The correlation between ACINX and SMGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACINX vs. SMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACINX
ACINX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ACINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACINX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ACINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACINX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SMGIX
SMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACINXSMGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.85

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

11.72

-10.15

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACINX and SMGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACINXSMGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.34

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.71

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.78

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.70

-0.17

Drawdowns

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACINX drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, which is greater than SMGIX's maximum drawdown of -50.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACINX and SMGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACINXSMGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.92%

-50.62%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.23%

-9.99%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-19.92%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.12%

-32.20%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.12%

-32.45%

-13.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.70%

0.00%

-13.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-6.74%

-8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

2.42%

+2.01%

Volatility

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) at 3.03%. This indicates that ACINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACINXSMGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.03%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

9.05%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

12.18%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.98%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

18.98%

-0.64%

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACINX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SMGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACINX vs. SMGIX - Dividend Comparison

ACINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than SMGIX's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACINX
Columbia Acorn International Fund
5.50%5.92%10.97%0.00%3.12%16.16%12.94%11.09%29.07%6.17%1.33%5.34%
SMGIX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund
6.69%7.39%9.69%3.08%10.61%13.70%7.69%5.87%10.17%4.89%0.76%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACINX and SMGIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACINX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to SMGIX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACINX dropped -60.92% vs SMGIX's -50.62%.

SMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACINX and SMGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer