ACINX vs. OAKIX
ACINX (Columbia Acorn International Fund) and OAKIX (Oakmark International Fund) are both mutual funds - ACINX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Columbia, while OAKIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Oakmark. Over the past 10 years, ACINX returned 5.19%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for OAKIX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACINX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for OAKIX.
Performance
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACINX achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than OAKIX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ACINX has underperformed OAKIX with an annualized return of 5.19%, while OAKIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.22% annualized return.
ACINX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 7.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.19%
OAKIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 14.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACINX Columbia Acorn International Fund | 8.14% | 12.52% | -6.57% | 19.57% | -33.64% | 12.92% | 15.15% | 29.84% | -18.35% | 31.20% |
OAKIX Oakmark International Fund | 1.23% | 32.40% | -4.60% | 18.86% | -15.72% | 9.04% | 4.92% | 24.24% | -23.41% | 29.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACINX and OAKIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1992 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ACINX and OAKIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACINX vs. OAKIX — Risk / Return Rank
ACINX
OAKIX
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and Oakmark International Fund (OAKIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACINX | OAKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.99 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 3.05 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACINX drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, smaller than the maximum OAKIX drawdown of -65.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACINX and OAKIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACINX | OAKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -65.18% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.23% | -14.35% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.22% | -18.72% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.12% | -35.87% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.12% | -53.05% | +6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.31% | -4.42% | -8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -11.70% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.66% | -0.20% |
Volatility
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Oakmark International Fund (OAKIX) at 4.50%. This indicates that ACINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OAKIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACINX | OAKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 4.50% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 11.84% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 15.07% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 19.18% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 21.30% | -2.94% |
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACINX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than OAKIX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACINX vs. OAKIX - Dividend Comparison
ACINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than OAKIX's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACINX Columbia Acorn International Fund | 4.71% | 5.92% | 10.97% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 16.16% | 12.94% | 11.09% | 29.07% | 6.17% | 1.33% | 5.34% |
OAKIX Oakmark International Fund | 1.82% | 1.84% | 2.46% | 1.85% | 2.97% | 1.23% | 0.33% | 1.81% | 7.15% | 3.04% | 1.48% | 5.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACINX and OAKIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACINX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to OAKIX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACINX dropped -60.92% vs OAKIX's -65.18%.
OAKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACINX and OAKIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer