ACINX vs. MWNIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund (MWNIX).
ACINX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 22, 1992. MWNIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Oct 8, 1997.
Performance
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACINX Columbia Acorn International Fund | -6.82% | 12.52% | -6.57% | 19.57% | -33.64% | 12.92% | 15.15% | 29.84% | -18.35% | 31.20% |
MWNIX MFS International New Discovery Fund | -4.10% | 16.88% | 0.90% | 13.03% | -18.63% | 5.06% | 9.98% | 22.85% | -10.41% | 30.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACINX achieves a -6.82% return, which is significantly lower than MWNIX's -4.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ACINX has underperformed MWNIX with an annualized return of 3.31%, while MWNIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.54% annualized return.
ACINX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -14.23%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.31%
MWNIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACINX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MWNIX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACINX vs. MWNIX — Risk / Return Rank
ACINX
MWNIX
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund (MWNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACINX | MWNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | 0.93 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.13 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 0.63 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 2.39 | -1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACINX | MWNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.13 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.40 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.56 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACINX and MWNIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Dividend Comparison
ACINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than MWNIX's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACINX Columbia Acorn International Fund | 6.35% | 5.92% | 10.97% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 16.16% | 12.94% | 11.09% | 29.07% | 6.17% | 1.33% | 5.34% |
MWNIX MFS International New Discovery Fund | 3.38% | 3.24% | 7.61% | 4.05% | 5.68% | 5.06% | 3.90% | 2.67% | 6.68% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.12% |
Drawdowns
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACINX drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, roughly equal to the maximum MWNIX drawdown of -58.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACINX and MWNIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACINX | MWNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -58.38% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.23% | -11.78% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.12% | -33.67% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.12% | -34.72% | -11.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.30% | -11.78% | -13.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -9.61% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 3.09% | +1.01% |
Volatility
ACINX vs. MWNIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to MFS International New Discovery Fund (MWNIX) at 5.09%. This indicates that ACINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACINX | MWNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 5.09% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.57% | 8.21% | +4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 12.11% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 13.02% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 13.90% | +4.23% |