PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACINX vs. QISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACINX vs. QISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACINX achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than QISIX's 16.77% return.


ACINX

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.02%
YTD
7.29%
6M
7.79%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
-1.35%
10Y*
4.49%

QISIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
7.66%
YTD
16.77%
6M
16.35%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACINX vs. QISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ACINX
Columbia Acorn International Fund
7.29%12.52%-6.57%19.57%-33.64%12.92%15.15%20.15%
QISIX
Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund
16.77%18.14%-5.09%16.38%-19.17%3.48%13.72%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ACINX and QISIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.65

The correlation between ACINX and QISIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACINX vs. QISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACINX
ACINX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ACINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACINX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ACINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACINX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QISIX
QISIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACINX vs. QISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACINXQISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.19

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

7.34

-5.62

ACINX vs. QISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the QISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACINX and QISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACINXQISIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.77

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.20

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.48

+0.04

Drawdowns

ACINX vs. QISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACINX drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, which is greater than QISIX's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACINX and QISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACINXQISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.92%

-41.11%

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.23%

-10.48%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-15.47%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.12%

-37.79%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.98%

-0.39%

-13.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-12.09%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

3.11%

+1.32%

Volatility

ACINX vs. QISIX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX) at 3.93%. This indicates that ACINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACINXQISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

3.93%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

10.79%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

13.02%

+4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

14.87%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

16.01%

+2.33%

ACINX vs. QISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACINX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than QISIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACINX vs. QISIX - Dividend Comparison

ACINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than QISIX's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACINX
Columbia Acorn International Fund
5.52%5.92%10.97%0.00%3.12%16.16%12.94%11.09%29.07%6.17%1.33%5.34%
QISIX
Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund
1.62%1.89%3.29%1.27%1.66%2.52%0.68%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACINX and QISIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACINX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to QISIX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACINX dropped -60.92% vs QISIX's -41.11%.

QISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACINX and QISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer