ACII vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. ACII charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

ACII vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACII

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACII vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	-1.10%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

ACII vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACII	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-7.55	—	—

Drawdowns

ACII vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACII drawdown since its inception was -1.27%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACII and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACII	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	0.00%	-0.42%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACII	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.65%	0.00%	+7.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.65%	0.00%	+7.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.65%	0.00%	+7.65%

ACII vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACII has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACII vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

ACII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	0.74%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ACII or IPDP?

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACII or IPDP?

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACII or IPDP?

ACII has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between ACII and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACII and 1.52% for IPDP.