ACGR vs. TAXF
ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) and TAXF (American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while TAXF is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by American Century. ACGR is passively managed, while TAXF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACGR returned 13.01%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for TAXF. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TAXF.
Performance
ACGR vs. TAXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACGR having a 2.14% return and TAXF slightly higher at 2.22%.
ACGR
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- —
TAXF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
ACGR vs. TAXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 2.14% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
TAXF American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF | 2.22% | 4.30% | 1.74% | 7.33% | -9.64% | 2.72% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGR and TAXF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACGR vs. TAXF — Risk / Return Rank
ACGR
TAXF
ACGR vs. TAXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACGR | TAXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.53 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.53 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 9.09 | -5.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACGR vs. TAXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, which is greater than TAXF's maximum drawdown of -13.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and TAXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGR | TAXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -13.93% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -2.93% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | -5.53% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | -13.93% | -20.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -0.22% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -3.13% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 0.81% | +3.98% |
Volatility
ACGR vs. TAXF - Volatility Comparison
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) at 0.75%. This indicates that ACGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACGR | TAXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 0.75% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 2.28% | +10.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 3.00% | +13.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 4.20% | +17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 4.64% | +16.79% |
ACGR vs. TAXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACGR vs. TAXF - Dividend Comparison
ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TAXF's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAXF American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF | 3.76% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.93% | 2.05% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 2.64% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACGR and TAXF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGR has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to TAXF (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGR dropped -34.54% vs TAXF's -13.93%.
On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 13.01% vs 1.13% for TAXF. On fees, TAXF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TAXF has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAXF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACGR.
TAXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.16% for ACGR.
ACGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TAXF is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACGR and 0.29% for TAXF.
TAXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACGR and TAXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer