PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACGIX vs. OPGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGIX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly higher than OPGSX's 3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGIX has underperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


ACGIX

1D
0.87%
1M
1.25%
YTD
7.45%
6M
9.24%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
11.17%

OPGSX

1D
1.33%
1M
1.97%
YTD
3.54%
6M
10.42%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
38.46%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACGIX
Invesco Growth and Income Fund
7.45%15.54%16.16%12.80%-6.00%28.66%2.33%24.49%-13.67%14.14%
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
3.54%131.03%13.05%6.35%-16.86%-2.75%36.15%46.37%-13.15%17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ACGIX and OPGSX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 1983

0.23

The correlation between ACGIX and OPGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACGIX vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGIX
ACGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ACGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ACGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

OPGSX
OPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACGIXOPGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.28

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.05

5.89

+7.16

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the OPGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGIX and OPGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACGIXOPGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.54

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.49

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.26

+0.19

Drawdowns

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGIX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum OPGSX drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGIX and OPGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACGIXOPGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.47%

-80.04%

+26.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-29.01%

+21.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-29.01%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-47.09%

+27.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.51%

-47.09%

+2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-22.32%

+21.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-29.29%

+18.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

10.74%

-8.92%

Volatility

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) is 2.81%, while Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a volatility of 13.17%. This indicates that ACGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACGIXOPGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

13.17%

-10.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

35.90%

-27.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

43.24%

-32.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

33.57%

-17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

32.88%

-13.65%

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACGIX vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison

ACGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than OPGSX's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACGIX
Invesco Growth and Income Fund
7.80%8.36%10.68%13.48%12.10%20.78%3.92%8.12%14.70%11.35%6.47%8.96%
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
0.41%0.43%0.86%0.81%0.45%3.56%1.55%0.29%0.00%2.78%7.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACGIX and OPGSX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPGSX has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to ACGIX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGIX dropped -53.47% vs OPGSX's -80.04%.

ACGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACGIX and OPGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer