PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACFOX vs. TWCUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACFOX having a 9.28% return and TWCUX slightly higher at 9.68%. Over the past 10 years, ACFOX has outperformed TWCUX with an annualized return of 19.58%, while TWCUX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.29% annualized return.


ACFOX

1D
-1.06%
1M
5.78%
YTD
9.28%
6M
10.92%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
28.29%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
19.58%

TWCUX

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.24%
YTD
9.68%
6M
8.02%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
18.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
9.28%20.51%43.30%35.66%-36.32%7.08%73.31%32.30%6.51%34.55%
TWCUX
American Century Ultra Fund
9.68%12.66%29.54%43.36%-32.38%23.47%49.79%34.60%0.70%31.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ACFOX and TWCUX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2006

0.93

The correlation between ACFOX and TWCUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACFOX vs. TWCUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACFOX
ACFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ACFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TWCUX
TWCUX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TWCUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) and American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACFOXTWCUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.68

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

5.89

+1.34

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the TWCUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACFOX and TWCUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACFOXTWCUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.62

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.83

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Drawdowns

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACFOX drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, smaller than the maximum TWCUX drawdown of -62.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFOX and TWCUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACFOXTWCUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.92%

-62.11%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.52%

-15.72%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.03%

-24.86%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

-35.23%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

-35.23%

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.39%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-16.81%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

4.48%

+0.19%

Volatility

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to American Century Ultra Fund (TWCUX) at 3.78%. This indicates that ACFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWCUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACFOXTWCUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.78%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

12.33%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

16.31%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.28%

22.56%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.81%

22.08%

+1.73%

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACFOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TWCUX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACFOX vs. TWCUX - Dividend Comparison

ACFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than TWCUX's 10.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
6.91%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.48%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.33%
TWCUX
American Century Ultra Fund
10.55%11.57%3.58%6.09%7.42%6.78%2.80%4.27%8.24%5.85%4.58%5.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ACFOX and TWCUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACFOX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to TWCUX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFOX dropped -58.92% vs TWCUX's -62.11%.

ACFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACFOX and TWCUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer