ACES vs. RIGS
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS).
ACES and RIGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACES is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
ACES vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACES vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 3.83% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | 1.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACES achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 0.28% return.
ACES
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 45.74%
- 3Y*
- -9.31%
- 5Y*
- -14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACES vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACES has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACES vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
ACES
RIGS
ACES vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACES | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 0.37 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 0.60 | +1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.08 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 0.74 | +2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 1.87 | +4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACES | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 0.37 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | 0.29 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.45 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACES and RIGS is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ACES vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than RIGS's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.67% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
ACES vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACES drawdown since its inception was -79.05%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACES and RIGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACES | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.05% | -15.31% | -63.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -5.18% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.44% | -9.03% | -65.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.84% | -2.15% | -62.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.36% | -1.60% | -36.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.06% | 2.05% | +5.01% |
Volatility
ACES vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) at 2.20%. This indicates that ACES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACES | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 2.20% | +8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.74% | 6.17% | +19.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.99% | 10.15% | +24.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 7.47% | +28.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.70% | 7.74% | +27.96% |