PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACES vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACES vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACES achieves a 32.49% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 14.56% return.


ACES

1D
2.95%
1M
20.25%
YTD
32.49%
6M
32.78%
1Y
80.47%
3Y*
-0.25%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*

IDOG

1D
0.32%
1M
2.78%
YTD
14.56%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.92%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACES vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
32.49%25.44%-26.71%-20.04%-28.44%-19.44%140.33%51.70%-9.63%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.56%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ACES and IDOG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018

0.51

The correlation between ACES and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACES vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACES
IDOG

Utilities

25.5%
10.0%

Technology

24.8%
8.5%

Industrials

20.3%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.5%

Basic Materials

9.3%
10.0%

Financial Services

5.3%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
9.4%

Energy

0.5%
10.7%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Healthcare

-

9.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

ACES
25.5%
IDOG
10.0%

Technology

ACES
24.8%
IDOG
8.5%

Industrials

ACES
20.3%
IDOG
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ACES
11.1%
IDOG
9.5%

Basic Materials

ACES
9.3%
IDOG
10.0%

Financial Services

ACES
5.3%
IDOG
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

ACES
3.2%
IDOG
9.4%

Energy

ACES
0.5%
IDOG
10.7%

Communication Services

ACES

-

IDOG
9.9%

Healthcare

ACES

-

IDOG
9.3%

Real Estate

ACES

-

IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACES vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACES
ACES Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ACES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACES Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ACES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACES Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACES vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACESIDOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.63

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.52

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

5.58

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.30

19.56

-8.26

ACES vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACES Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACES and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACESIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.63

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.88

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.52

-0.29

Drawdowns

ACES vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACES drawdown since its inception was -79.05%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACES and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACESIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.05%

-37.32%

-41.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-6.47%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.68%

-13.92%

-44.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.44%

-25.31%

-49.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.14%

0.00%

-55.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.86%

-7.93%

-30.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.91%

1.85%

+5.06%

Volatility

ACES vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.22%. This indicates that ACES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACESIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

4.22%

+5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.55%

10.07%

+12.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.32%

13.34%

+18.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.15%

15.61%

+20.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.58%

17.45%

+18.13%

ACES vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACES has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACES vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IDOG's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
0.53%0.70%1.10%1.44%1.08%0.71%0.56%1.79%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.40%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACES and IDOG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACES has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to IDOG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACES dropped -79.05% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 13.68% vs -8.07% for ACES. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 13.68% return vs -8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ACES.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.53% for ACES.

ACES is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IDOG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ACES and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACES and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer