ACES vs. IDOG
ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACES is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while IDOG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACES returned -8.07%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for IDOG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACES charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDOG.
Performance
ACES vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACES achieves a 32.49% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 14.56% return.
ACES
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 80.47%
- 3Y*
- -0.25%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
IDOG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
ACES vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 32.49% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.56% | 39.94% | 1.35% | 23.57% | -4.50% | 11.33% | -1.78% | 21.93% | -10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACES and IDOG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ACES and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACES vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACES
IDOG
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
ACES
IDOG
Technology
ACES
IDOG
Industrials
ACES
IDOG
Consumer Cyclical
ACES
IDOG
Basic Materials
ACES
IDOG
Financial Services
ACES
IDOG
Consumer Defensive
ACES
IDOG
Energy
ACES
IDOG
Communication Services
ACES
-
IDOG
Healthcare
ACES
-
IDOG
Real Estate
ACES
-
IDOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACES vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
ACES
IDOG
ACES vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACES | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.63 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 3.52 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 5.58 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 19.56 | -8.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACES | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.63 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.88 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.52 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
ACES vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACES drawdown since its inception was -79.05%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACES and IDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACES | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.05% | -37.32% | -41.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -6.47% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.68% | -13.92% | -44.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.44% | -25.31% | -49.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | 0.00% | -55.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.86% | -7.93% | -30.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 1.85% | +5.06% |
Volatility
ACES vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.22%. This indicates that ACES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACES | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 4.22% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.55% | 10.07% | +12.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.32% | 13.34% | +18.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.15% | 15.61% | +20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 17.45% | +18.13% |
ACES vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACES has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACES vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IDOG's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.53% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.40% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACES and IDOG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACES has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to IDOG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACES dropped -79.05% vs IDOG's -37.32%.
On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 13.68% vs -8.07% for ACES. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 13.68% return vs -8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ACES.
IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.53% for ACES.
ACES is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while IDOG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ACES and 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACES and IDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer