ACEP vs. VSLU
ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) and VSLU (Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ACEP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for VSLU.
Performance
ACEP vs. VSLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACEP achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly higher than VSLU's 10.53% return.
ACEP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VSLU
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.53K | $36.84K | $48.24K | |
| $857.15K | $1.16M | $1.76M |
ACEP vs. VSLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 24.65% | 8.00% |
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 10.53% | 5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEP and VSLU is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.61 |
ACEP vs. VSLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACEP
VSLU
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
ACEP
VSLU
Financial Services
ACEP
VSLU
Energy
ACEP
VSLU
Industrials
ACEP
VSLU
Basic Materials
ACEP
VSLU
Healthcare
ACEP
VSLU
Consumer Cyclical
ACEP
VSLU
Consumer Defensive
ACEP
VSLU
Real Estate
ACEP
VSLU
Communication Services
ACEP
VSLU
Utilities
ACEP
-
VSLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEP vs. VSLU — Risk / Return Rank
ACEP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VSLU
ACEP vs. VSLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACEP | VSLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACEP vs. VSLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEP drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum VSLU drawdown of -23.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEP and VSLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEP | VSLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -23.86% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -4.78% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility
ACEP vs. VSLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEP | VSLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 12.66% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 16.23% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 16.01% | +0.85% |
ACEP vs. VSLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACEP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than VSLU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACEP vs. VSLU - Dividend Comparison
ACEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than VSLU's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.99% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEP and VSLU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for VSLU.
VSLU has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.
They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Applied Finance. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACEP and 0.49% for VSLU.
Find the right allocation for ACEP and VSLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer