PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACEP vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACEP vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACEP achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.


ACEP

1D
-0.69%
1M
8.05%
YTD
24.34%
6M
27.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACEP vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACEP and BUFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACEP vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACEP vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACEPBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.41

2.68

+1.73

Drawdowns

ACEP vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACEP drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEP and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACEPBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-2.87%

-4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.07%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-0.24%

-1.17%

Volatility

ACEP vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACEPBUFXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

3.98%

+13.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

3.98%

+13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

3.98%

+13.31%

ACEP vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACEP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACEP vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

ACEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACEP and BUFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

ACEP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

ACEP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACEP and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACEP and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer