ACAZX vs. AAICX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ACAZX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z) and AAICX (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C) are both mutual funds - ACAZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger, while AAICX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past year, ACAZX returned 40.17% vs 60.29% for AAICX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACAZX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for AAICX.

Performance

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAZX achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than AAICX's 25.81% return.

ACAZX

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 7.44%
• YTD: 14.21%
• 6M: 12.80%
• 1Y: 40.17%
• 3Y*: 43.03%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

AAICX

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 11.29%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 24.55%
• 1Y: 60.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	14.21%	31.33%	44.42%
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C	25.81%	39.54%	32.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAZX and AAICX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024	0.99

The correlation between ACAZX and AAICX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACAZX vs. AAICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAZX

ACAZX Risk / Return Rank: 38
ACAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ACAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ACAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ACAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

AAICX

AAICX Risk / Return Rank: 69
AAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACAZX	AAICX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.79	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.38	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.44	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	3.48	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.11	10.52	-3.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the AAICX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAZX and AAICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACAZX	AAICX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.79	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.78	-1.01

Drawdowns

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAZX drawdown since its inception was -47.92%, which is greater than AAICX's maximum drawdown of -29.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAZX and AAICX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACAZX	AAICX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.92%	-29.07%	-18.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.97%	-17.87%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-1.34%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.34%	-5.08%	-3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.85%	5.90%	-0.05%

Volatility

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) is 5.24%, while Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C (AAICX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that ACAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACAZX	AAICX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	5.59%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.85%	16.82%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.01%	22.34%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.98%	27.41%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.44%	27.41%	-1.97%

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AAICX's 1.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACAZX vs. AAICX - Dividend Comparison

ACAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than AAICX's 5.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAICX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters C	5.12%	6.44%	4.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	7.73%	8.83%	23.61%	6.65%	4.13%	22.24%	14.91%	7.87%	11.23%	6.60%	0.82%	8.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACAZX and AAICX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, ACAZX and AAICX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACAZX or AAICX?

AAICX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to ACAZX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAZX dropped -47.92% vs AAICX's -29.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.