ACAZX vs. AAGOX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ACAZX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z) and AAGOX (Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Alger. Over the past 10 years, ACAZX returned 20.27%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for AAGOX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. ACAZX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for AAGOX.

Performance

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AAGOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAZX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than AAGOX's 12.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ACAZX has outperformed AAGOX with an annualized return of 20.27%, while AAGOX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.19% annualized return.

ACAZX

• 1D: 4.67%
• 1M: -3.05%
• 6M: 9.60%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 36.95%
• 5Y*: 17.54%
• 10Y*: 20.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.92%

AAGOX

• 1D: 3.96%
• 1M: -4.98%
• 6M: 13.74%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 1Y: 27.06%
• 3Y*: 28.99%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 18.19%
• ALL TIME*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAGOX Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	7.46%	31.33%	69.38%	43.53%	-36.63%	18.48%	42.23%	33.63%	-0.61%	31.78%
AAGOX Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund	12.62%	29.82%	42.89%	32.67%	-38.76%	12.63%	67.21%	27.43%	2.36%	28.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAZX and AAGOX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2010	0.97

The correlation between ACAZX and AAGOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACAZX vs. AAGOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACAZX

ACAZX Risk / Return Rank: 24
ACAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ACAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ACAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
ACAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
ACAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

AAGOX

AAGOX Risk / Return Rank: 29
AAGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
AAGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AAGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AAGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
AAGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AAGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACAZX	AAGOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	0.93	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	1.41	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.17	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	1.38	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	3.91	-0.75

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the AAGOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAZX and AAGOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAZX drawdown since its inception was -47.92%, smaller than the maximum AAGOX drawdown of -60.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAZX and AAGOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACAZX	AAGOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.92%	-60.22%	+12.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.97%	-18.11%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.72%	-27.34%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.92%	-44.07%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.92%	-44.07%	-3.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.50%	-10.78%	+3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-15.66%	+7.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.25%	6.40%	-0.15%

Volatility

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) is 7.95%, while Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AAGOX) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that ACAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACAZX	AAGOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.95%	8.52%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	21.70%	-2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.77%	27.05%	-3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.44%	26.79%	+2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.67%	25.02%	+0.65%

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AAGOX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACAZX vs. AAGOX - Dividend Comparison

ACAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, less than AAGOX's 10.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAGOX Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund	10.75%	12.11%	0.00%	0.00%	5.91%	28.74%	14.75%	1.88%	22.68%	9.81%	0.00%	12.42%
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	8.22%	8.83%	23.61%	6.65%	4.13%	22.24%	14.91%	7.87%	11.23%	6.60%	0.82%	8.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACAZX and AAGOX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ACAZX and AAGOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACAZX or AAGOX?

AAGOX has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to ACAZX (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAZX dropped -47.92% vs AAGOX's -60.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.