PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACAYX vs. AMRGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAYX achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 18.37% return.


ACAYX

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.76%
YTD
17.07%
6M
16.59%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
44.79%
5Y*
22.14%
10Y*

AMRGX

1D
1.75%
1M
7.84%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.83%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACAYX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y
17.07%32.26%70.32%43.39%-36.58%18.80%42.01%33.67%-0.38%18.92%
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
18.37%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%36.73%-9.07%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAYX and AMRGX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between ACAYX and AMRGX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACAYX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAYX
ACAYX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ACAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ACAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACAYXAMRGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.83

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

6.90

+1.64

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the AMRGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAYX and AMRGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACAYXAMRGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.47

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.48

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.12

+0.74

Drawdowns

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAYX drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAYX and AMRGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACAYXAMRGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-80.32%

+33.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-13.98%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.75%

-21.15%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.37%

-35.42%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-40.25%

+29.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

5.66%

-0.10%

Volatility

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) is 5.09%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that ACAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACAYXAMRGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

6.47%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

24.98%

-8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

26.89%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.25%

22.21%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

21.50%

+4.32%

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAYX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACAYX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison

ACAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than AMRGX's 15.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACAYX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y
5.67%6.64%24.81%7.76%3.77%18.85%16.28%10.19%12.28%6.73%
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
15.06%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACAYX and AMRGX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to ACAYX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAYX dropped -46.37% vs AMRGX's -80.32%.

ACAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACAYX and AMRGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer