PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACAYX vs. ACAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund (ACAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAYX achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than ACAAX's 15.50% return.


ACAYX

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.76%
YTD
17.07%
6M
16.59%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
44.79%
5Y*
22.14%
10Y*

ACAAX

1D
-0.43%
1M
9.17%
YTD
15.50%
6M
15.01%
1Y
42.75%
3Y*
37.43%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
19.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACAYX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y
17.07%32.26%70.32%43.39%-36.58%18.80%42.01%33.67%-0.38%18.92%
ACAAX
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund
15.50%30.80%49.55%42.99%-36.90%18.17%41.78%33.14%-0.95%18.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAYX and ACAAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017

1.00

The correlation between ACAYX and ACAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACAYX vs. ACAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAYX
ACAYX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ACAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ACAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ACAAX
ACAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ACAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ACAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund (ACAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACAYXACAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.32

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

7.47

+1.07

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the ACAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAYX and ACAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACAYXACAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.12

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.63

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.52

+0.35

Drawdowns

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAYX drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum ACAAX drawdown of -70.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAYX and ACAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACAYXACAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-70.29%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-19.11%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.75%

-27.79%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.37%

-48.73%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.43%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-22.96%

+12.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

5.92%

-0.36%

Volatility

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund (ACAAX) have volatilities of 5.09% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACAYXACAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

4.96%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

15.78%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

20.96%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.25%

28.89%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

25.40%

+0.42%

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAYX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than ACAAX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACAYX vs. ACAAX - Dividend Comparison

ACAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than ACAAX's 8.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACAAX
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund
8.48%9.80%12.93%7.19%4.42%23.67%15.64%8.17%11.59%6.76%0.84%8.28%
ACAYX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y
5.67%6.64%24.81%7.76%3.77%18.85%16.28%10.19%12.28%6.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ACAYX and ACAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACAYX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to ACAAX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAYX dropped -46.37% vs ACAAX's -70.29%.

ACAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACAYX and ACAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer