PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABYAX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A (ABYAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABYAX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ABYAX has underperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 2.66%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.68% annualized return.


ABYAX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-1.04%
6M
1.06%
YTD
4.10%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
1.17%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
2.66%
ALL TIME*
3.63%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABYAX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A
4.10%1.47%0.77%-3.55%16.76%3.19%7.59%8.65%-6.49%-0.26%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ABYAX and MBXIX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABYAX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABYAX
ABYAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ABYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ABYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A (ABYAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABYAXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.88

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

14.92

-7.22

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABYAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABYAX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABYAX drawdown since its inception was -17.96%, smaller than the maximum MBXIX drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABYAX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABYAXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.96%

-31.73%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-3.85%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.21%

-15.59%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.23%

-15.59%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.23%

-31.73%

+16.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-2.68%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-3.95%

-3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.04%

+0.40%

Volatility

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A (ABYAX) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that ABYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABYAXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.59%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.55%

4.89%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

6.90%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.88%

11.40%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

13.36%

-5.40%

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ABYAX and MBXIX have an expense ratio of 2.04%.


Dividends

ABYAX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

ABYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABYAX
Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A
1.22%1.27%1.68%0.99%15.33%3.57%1.36%8.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.06%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABYAX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABYAX has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABYAX dropped -17.96% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABYAX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer