PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABWYX vs. MFTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) and Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABWYX achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than MFTFX's 17.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABWYX having a 6.27% annualized return and MFTFX not far ahead at 6.32%.


ABWYX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.67%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.25%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
6.27%

MFTFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.76%
YTD
17.32%
6M
22.95%
1Y
44.18%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
6.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABWYX
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio
7.91%15.50%8.54%11.43%-19.60%13.27%5.11%19.72%-7.64%11.49%
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
17.32%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ABWYX and MFTFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.10

Over the past year, ABWYX and MFTFX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABWYX vs. MFTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABWYX
ABWYX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ABWYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABWYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABWYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ABWYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABWYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) and Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABWYXMFTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

4.61

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

12.93

-1.60

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABWYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the MFTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABWYX and MFTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABWYXMFTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.31

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.48

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.29

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.18

+0.32

Drawdowns

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABWYX drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, which is greater than MFTFX's maximum drawdown of -35.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABWYX and MFTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABWYXMFTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-35.70%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-9.83%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-32.57%

+21.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.69%

-32.57%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.15%

-35.70%

+9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.14%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-16.98%

+10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.49%

-1.80%

Volatility

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB All Market Total Return Portfolio (ABWYX) is 2.85%, while Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that ABWYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABWYXMFTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

4.02%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

12.43%

-5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

19.61%

-10.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

22.05%

-11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.55%

22.14%

-11.59%

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABWYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than MFTFX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABWYX vs. MFTFX - Dividend Comparison

ABWYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, while MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABWYX
AB All Market Total Return Portfolio
10.52%11.35%3.37%1.47%3.11%9.56%3.11%3.16%0.00%1.40%3.46%2.63%
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABWYX and MFTFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTFX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to ABWYX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABWYX dropped -46.27% vs MFTFX's -35.70%.

MFTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABWYX and MFTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer