ABVYX vs. AWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABVYX (AB Value Fund) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - ABVYX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, ABVYX returned 10.78%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for AWF. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABVYX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

ABVYX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Value Fund (ABVYX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABVYX achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ABVYX has outperformed AWF with an annualized return of 10.78%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.

ABVYX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 13.95%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 33.22%
• 3Y*: 19.70%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: 10.78%

AWF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABVYX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABVYX AB Value Fund	13.95%	17.12%	15.83%	18.81%	-6.72%	27.26%	1.14%	20.19%	-14.92%	13.70%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.70%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ABVYX and AWF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2001	0.37

The correlation between ABVYX and AWF shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ABVYX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABVYX

ABVYX Risk / Return Rank: 88
ABVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ABVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ABVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ABVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ABVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 3
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABVYX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Value Fund (ABVYX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABVYX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	0.16	+2.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.36	0.29	+4.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.04	+0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	0.14	+4.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	0.33	+17.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABVYX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABVYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABVYX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABVYX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	0.16	+2.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.35	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.38	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.31	+0.05

Drawdowns

ABVYX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABVYX drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, which is greater than AWF's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABVYX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABVYX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-55.54%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-10.19%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.52%	-11.12%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	-25.25%	+7.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.42%	-40.12%	-0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.81%	+5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.55%	-12.31%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	4.26%	-2.31%

Volatility

ABVYX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Value Fund (ABVYX) is 2.79%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that ABVYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABVYX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	3.53%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	7.25%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	8.70%	+2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.44%	12.11%	+5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	15.22%	+3.73%

ABVYX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABVYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABVYX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

ABVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than AWF's 7.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABVYX AB Value Fund	8.66%	9.87%	12.66%	4.95%	13.64%	10.27%	1.38%	2.37%	5.21%	1.22%	1.35%	1.64%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.68%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABVYX and AWF in my portfolio?

ABVYX and AWF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABVYX or AWF?

AWF has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to ABVYX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABVYX dropped -64.02% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABVYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.