PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABRVX vs. PWLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABRVX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than PWLIX's -0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ABRVX has outperformed PWLIX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while PWLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.


ABRVX

1D
0.16%
1M
4.77%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.44%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
6.77%

PWLIX

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
-0.18%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
4.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABRVX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund
10.02%-0.70%11.76%8.89%-27.36%15.95%49.42%9.08%-3.28%9.50%
PWLIX
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund
-0.41%4.64%4.65%4.04%4.33%15.15%-12.66%9.60%0.49%11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ABRVX and PWLIX is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.12

The correlation between ABRVX and PWLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABRVX vs. PWLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABRVX
ABRVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ABRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PWLIX
PWLIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
PWLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PWLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABRVXPWLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

-0.02

+2.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

0.03

+3.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.00

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

-0.02

+3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.10

-0.06

+11.16

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABRVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the PWLIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABRVX and PWLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABRVXPWLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

-0.02

+2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.49

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.43

+0.06

Drawdowns

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABRVX drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than PWLIX's maximum drawdown of -26.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRVX and PWLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRVXPWLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-26.92%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-9.43%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-11.74%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-11.74%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.71%

-26.92%

-2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-9.06%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-4.18%

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.22%

-1.28%

Volatility

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Volatility Comparison

ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRVXPWLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.58%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

6.55%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

8.43%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

8.96%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

9.00%

+4.66%

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABRVX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PWLIX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABRVX vs. PWLIX - Dividend Comparison

ABRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than PWLIX's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRVX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund
1.15%1.26%2.07%0.00%0.00%8.33%24.49%0.80%3.95%3.26%1.29%0.00%
PWLIX
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund
6.67%6.65%4.75%5.51%14.75%11.99%7.31%6.79%0.39%10.82%4.16%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABRVX and PWLIX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABRVX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to PWLIX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABRVX dropped -29.71% vs PWLIX's -26.92%.

ABRVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABRVX and PWLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer