PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABR vs. TWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABR vs. TWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABR achieves a -28.48% return, which is significantly lower than TWO's 24.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ABR has outperformed TWO with an annualized return of 7.94%, while TWO has yielded a comparatively lower -2.88% annualized return.


ABR

1D
1.96%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-28.48%
6M
-30.37%
1Y
-42.45%
3Y*
-18.47%
5Y*
-12.08%
10Y*
7.94%

TWO

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
24.99%
6M
15.02%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
-4.72%
10Y*
-2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABR vs. TWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
-28.48%-36.65%3.16%29.73%-20.73%39.42%10.04%55.19%30.04%26.60%
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
24.99%2.52%-2.73%2.31%-23.25%0.03%-52.19%28.73%-10.33%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ABR and TWO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2009

0.44

The correlation between ABR and TWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ABR:

$0.57

TWO:

-$4.56

PS Ratio

ABR:

1.17

TWO:

1.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABR:

$940.70M

TWO:

$546.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABR:

$829.57M

TWO:

$524.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABR:

$878.83M

TWO:

-$7.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABR vs. TWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABR
ABR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ABR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ABR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TWO
TWO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABR vs. TWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABRTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.20

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.85

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

2.41

-3.88

ABR vs. TWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABR Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the TWO Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABR and TWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABR vs. TWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABR drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than TWO's maximum drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABR and TWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.76%

-84.71%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.82%

-36.81%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.55%

-36.81%

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.55%

-57.23%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.76%

-84.71%

+11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.76%

-56.77%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.88%

-28.63%

-13.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.02%

12.92%

+16.10%

Volatility

ABR vs. TWO - Volatility Comparison

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) at 1.67%. This indicates that ABR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

1.67%

+9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.80%

36.95%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.31%

40.70%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.13%

33.19%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.46%

47.99%

-7.53%

Dividends

ABR vs. TWO - Dividend Comparison

ABR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.58%, more than TWO's 11.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
20.58%17.14%12.42%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%11.22%8.33%8.31%8.11%
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
11.44%15.52%15.22%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%23.31%10.67%12.84%

Financials

ABR vs. TWO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Two Harbors Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
25.74M
0
(ABR) Total Revenue
(TWO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABR and TWO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABR has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to TWO (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABR dropped -97.76% vs TWO's -84.71%.

TWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABR and TWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer