PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWO vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TWO vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWO achieves a 25.39% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TWO has underperformed AGNC with an annualized return of -2.70%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.31% annualized return.


TWO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
25.39%
6M
29.08%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
-3.67%
10Y*
-2.70%

AGNC

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
1.46%
6M
4.85%
1Y
30.97%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWO vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
25.39%2.52%-2.73%2.31%-23.25%0.03%-52.19%28.73%-10.33%26.53%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
1.46%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TWO and AGNC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2009

0.64

The correlation between TWO and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TWO:

-$4.56

AGNC:

$1.33

PS Ratio

TWO:

1.77

AGNC:

4.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

TWO:

$546.33M

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TWO:

$524.61M

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

TWO:

-$7.58M

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWO vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWO
TWO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWO vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWOAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.66

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

5.00

-2.36

TWO vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWO and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWOAGNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.61

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.07

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.25

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.43

-0.35

Drawdowns

TWO vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWO drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWO and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWOAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.71%

-54.56%

-30.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.81%

-18.71%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.81%

-31.04%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.23%

-54.56%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.71%

-54.56%

-30.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.63%

-10.63%

-46.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-13.56%

-15.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.78%

6.20%

+6.58%

Volatility

TWO vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) is 3.08%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that TWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWOAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

4.90%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.05%

15.90%

+21.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.84%

19.31%

+21.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.25%

25.82%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.99%

25.38%

+22.61%

Dividends

TWO vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

TWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, less than AGNC's 13.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.99%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
11.41%15.52%15.22%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%23.31%10.67%12.84%

Financials

TWO vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Two Harbors Investment Corp. and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B2022202320242025202600
(TWO) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TWO and AGNC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGNC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to TWO (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWO dropped -84.71% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWO and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer