PortfoliosLab logo
TWO vs. AGNC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TWO and AGNC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TWO vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
40.18%
183.06%
TWO
AGNC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TWO:

0.25

AGNC:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

TWO:

0.38

AGNC:

0.61

Omega Ratio

TWO:

1.05

AGNC:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

TWO:

0.06

AGNC:

0.29

Martin Ratio

TWO:

0.43

AGNC:

1.17

Ulcer Index

TWO:

9.07%

AGNC:

6.78%

Daily Std Dev

TWO:

24.76%

AGNC:

21.33%

Max Drawdown

TWO:

-84.71%

AGNC:

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

TWO:

-63.59%

AGNC:

-19.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TWO:

$1.23B

AGNC:

$8.94B

EPS

TWO:

-$0.33

AGNC:

$0.36

PEG Ratio

TWO:

3.59

AGNC:

17.55

PS Ratio

TWO:

3.33

AGNC:

14.28

PB Ratio

TWO:

0.80

AGNC:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

TWO:

$600.28M

AGNC:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TWO:

$294.08M

AGNC:

$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

TWO:

$491.59M

AGNC:

$2.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TWO has underperformed AGNC with an annualized return of -5.25%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.87% annualized return.


TWO

YTD

7.94%

1M

9.01%

6M

8.76%

1Y

6.09%

5Y*

4.63%

10Y*

-5.25%

AGNC

YTD

1.32%

1M

5.38%

6M

0.54%

1Y

8.02%

5Y*

5.67%

10Y*

3.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TWO vs. AGNC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TWO is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TWO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TWO is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TWO is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TWO is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TWO is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGNC is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGNC is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGNC is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGNC is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGNC is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGNC is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TWO vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWO and AGNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.25
0.38
TWO
AGNC

Dividends

TWO vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

TWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.18%, less than AGNC's 16.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
15.18%15.22%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%10.65%10.67%12.84%10.38%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
16.22%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%11.96%

Drawdowns

TWO vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWO drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWO and AGNC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-63.59%
-19.37%
TWO
AGNC

Volatility

TWO vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) have volatilities of 12.14% and 12.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.14%
12.49%
TWO
AGNC

Financials

TWO vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Two Harbors Investment Corp. and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B20212022202320242025
268.24M
-418.00M
(TWO) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items