PortfoliosLab logo
TWO vs. CIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TWO and CIM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TWO vs. CIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
39.00%
73.15%
TWO
CIM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TWO:

0.21

CIM:

-0.02

Sortino Ratio

TWO:

0.40

CIM:

0.62

Omega Ratio

TWO:

1.05

CIM:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

TWO:

0.06

CIM:

0.13

Martin Ratio

TWO:

0.46

CIM:

0.79

Ulcer Index

TWO:

9.11%

CIM:

11.81%

Daily Std Dev

TWO:

24.76%

CIM:

36.65%

Max Drawdown

TWO:

-84.71%

CIM:

-89.69%

Current Drawdown

TWO:

-63.89%

CIM:

-65.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TWO:

$1.23B

CIM:

$986.22M

EPS

TWO:

-$0.33

CIM:

$1.10

PEG Ratio

TWO:

3.59

CIM:

-28.14

PS Ratio

TWO:

3.33

CIM:

3.55

PB Ratio

TWO:

0.80

CIM:

0.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

TWO:

$600.28M

CIM:

$559.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TWO:

$294.08M

CIM:

$473.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

TWO:

$491.59M

CIM:

$414.13M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWO achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than CIM's -7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TWO has underperformed CIM with an annualized return of -5.37%, while CIM has yielded a comparatively higher -0.48% annualized return.


TWO

YTD

7.03%

1M

3.16%

6M

6.58%

1Y

5.28%

5Y*

4.44%

10Y*

-5.37%

CIM

YTD

-7.16%

1M

9.92%

6M

-12.63%

1Y

-0.62%

5Y*

-1.75%

10Y*

-0.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TWO vs. CIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TWO is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TWO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TWO is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TWO is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TWO is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TWO is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIM is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIM is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIM is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIM is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIM is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIM is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TWO vs. CIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TWO Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the CIM Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWO and CIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.21
-0.02
TWO
CIM

Dividends

TWO vs. CIM - Dividend Comparison

TWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.31%, more than CIM's 11.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
15.31%15.22%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%10.65%10.67%12.84%10.38%
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
11.56%10.14%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%10.82%14.34%14.08%17.61%

Drawdowns

TWO vs. CIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWO drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, smaller than the maximum CIM drawdown of -89.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWO and CIM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-63.89%
-65.85%
TWO
CIM

Volatility

TWO vs. CIM - Volatility Comparison

Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) have volatilities of 11.33% and 11.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.33%
11.90%
TWO
CIM

Financials

TWO vs. CIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Two Harbors Investment Corp. and Chimera Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.50B-1.00B-500.00M0.00500.00M20212022202320242025
268.24M
191.54M
(TWO) Total Revenue
(CIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TWO vs. CIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Two Harbors Investment Corp. and Chimera Investment Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
49.7%
97.4%
(TWO) Gross Margin
(CIM) Gross Margin
TWO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Two Harbors Investment Corp. reported a gross profit of 133.33M and revenue of 268.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.7%.

CIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chimera Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 186.60M and revenue of 191.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.4%.

TWO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Two Harbors Investment Corp. reported an operating income of 86.24M and revenue of 268.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.2%.

CIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chimera Investment Corporation reported an operating income of -24.52M and revenue of 191.54M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.8%.

TWO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Two Harbors Investment Corp. reported a net income of -79.06M and revenue of 268.24M, resulting in a net margin of -29.5%.

CIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chimera Investment Corporation reported a net income of -146.51M and revenue of 191.54M, resulting in a net margin of -76.5%.