TWO vs. CIM
TWO (Two Harbors Investment Corp.) and CIM (Chimera Investment Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, TWO returned -2.76%/yr vs -1.22%/yr for CIM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TWO vs. CIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWO achieves a 25.39% return, which is significantly higher than CIM's 9.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TWO has underperformed CIM with an annualized return of -2.76%, while CIM has yielded a comparatively higher -1.22% annualized return.
TWO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 25.39%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- 34.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.13%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- -2.76%
CIM
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 9.61%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 10.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- -11.53%
- 10Y*
- -1.22%
TWO vs. CIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 25.39% | 2.52% | -2.73% | 2.31% | -23.25% | 0.03% | -52.19% | 28.73% | -10.33% | 26.53% |
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 9.61% | -0.65% | 3.61% | 2.95% | -57.95% | 60.73% | -42.97% | 27.65% | 7.71% | 17.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWO and CIM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2009 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TWO and CIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TWO:
-$4.56
CIM:
$0.23
TWO:
1.77
CIM:
2.17
TWO:
$546.33M
CIM:
$499.18M
TWO:
$524.61M
CIM:
$465.68M
TWO:
-$7.58M
CIM:
$439.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWO vs. CIM — Risk / Return Rank
TWO
CIM
TWO vs. CIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.61 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 1.48 | +1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.44 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | -0.33 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | -0.03 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.05 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
TWO vs. CIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWO drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, smaller than the maximum CIM drawdown of -89.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWO and CIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.71% | -89.69% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.81% | -18.18% | -18.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.81% | -35.80% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.23% | -69.09% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.71% | -72.35% | -12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.63% | -59.94% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -51.74% | +23.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.77% | 7.45% | +5.32% |
Volatility
TWO vs. CIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) is 3.09%, while Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that TWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 4.93% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.09% | 17.80% | +19.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.91% | 25.31% | +15.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.25% | 35.25% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.00% | 36.47% | +11.53% |
Dividends
TWO vs. CIM - Dividend Comparison
TWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, less than CIM's 11.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 11.87% | 11.91% | 10.14% | 14.03% | 20.36% | 8.55% | 13.66% | 9.73% | 11.22% | 8.12% | 14.34% | 28.15% |
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 11.41% | 15.52% | 15.22% | 15.08% | 12.94% | 11.79% | 7.85% | 11.42% | 14.64% | 23.31% | 10.67% | 12.84% |
Financials
TWO vs. CIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Two Harbors Investment Corp. and Chimera Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TWO and CIM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIM has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to TWO (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWO dropped -84.71% vs CIM's -89.69%.
TWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWO and CIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer