TWO vs. CIM
Compare and contrast key facts about Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM).
Performance
TWO vs. CIM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TWO vs. CIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 11.29% | 2.52% | -2.73% | 2.31% | -23.25% | 0.03% | -52.19% | 28.73% | -10.33% | 26.53% |
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 4.77% | -0.65% | 3.61% | 2.95% | -57.95% | 60.73% | -42.97% | 27.65% | 7.71% | 17.30% |
Fundamentals
TWO:
-$4.36
CIM:
$4.21
TWO:
2.79
CIM:
2.36
TWO:
$422.76M
CIM:
$290.86M
TWO:
$561.79M
CIM:
$290.86M
TWO:
$420.52M
CIM:
$331.37M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWO achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than CIM's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, TWO has underperformed CIM with an annualized return of -2.99%, while CIM has yielded a comparatively higher -0.52% annualized return.
TWO
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- -5.97%
- 10Y*
- -2.99%
CIM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.29%
- 5Y*
- -10.14%
- 10Y*
- -0.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWO vs. CIM — Risk / Return Rank
TWO
CIM
TWO vs. CIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | 0.36 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 0.72 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.10 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.57 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 1.29 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 0.36 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.29 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.06 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between TWO and CIM is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TWO vs. CIM - Dividend Comparison
TWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.44%, more than CIM's 12.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 13.44% | 15.52% | 15.22% | 15.08% | 12.94% | 11.79% | 7.85% | 11.42% | 14.64% | 23.31% | 10.67% | 12.84% |
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 12.42% | 11.91% | 10.14% | 14.03% | 20.36% | 8.55% | 13.66% | 9.73% | 11.22% | 8.12% | 14.34% | 28.15% |
Drawdowns
TWO vs. CIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWO drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, smaller than the maximum CIM drawdown of -89.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWO and CIM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.71% | -89.69% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.81% | -18.18% | -18.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.23% | -69.09% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.71% | -72.35% | -12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.51% | -61.71% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.24% | -51.67% | +23.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.68% | 8.07% | +9.61% |
Volatility
TWO vs. CIM - Volatility Comparison
Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) at 7.24%. This indicates that TWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TWO | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 7.24% | +9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.84% | 20.82% | +16.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.19% | 31.28% | +11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.58% | 35.26% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.91% | 36.39% | +11.52% |
Financials
TWO vs. CIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Two Harbors Investment Corp. and Chimera Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities