ABOT vs. SPIT

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

ABOT (Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ABOT is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABOT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

ABOT vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABOT achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 30.33% return.

ABOT

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: 3.99%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: —

SPIT

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 7.44%
• 6M: 24.09%
• YTD: 30.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABOT vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF	3.85%	-3.82%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	30.33%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ABOT and SPIT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

ABOT vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABOT

ABOT Risk / Return Rank: 11
ABOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ABOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
ABOT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ABOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ABOT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABOT vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABOT	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.46	—	—

Drawdowns

ABOT vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABOT drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABOT and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABOT	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-12.49%	-17.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-3.18%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.44%	-2.48%	-6.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABOT	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.47%	26.43%	-7.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.82%	26.43%	-6.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	26.43%	-6.67%

ABOT vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABOT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABOT vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

ABOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than SPIT's 5.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF	0.33%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.51%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABOT and SPIT in my portfolio?

ABOT and SPIT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABOT or SPIT?

On fees, ABOT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABOT or SPIT?

ABOT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABOT or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 0.33% for ABOT.

What is the main difference between ABOT and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABOT and 0.89% for SPIT.