ABOT vs. SGRT

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

ABOT (Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ABOT is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABOT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

ABOT vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABOT achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 32.19% return.

ABOT

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: 3.99%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 1Y: 4.27%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -3.98%
• 1M: -3.74%
• 6M: 26.09%
• YTD: 32.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABOT vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF	3.85%	2.47%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	32.19%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ABOT and SGRT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

ABOT vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABOT

ABOT Risk / Return Rank: 11
ABOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ABOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
ABOT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ABOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ABOT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABOT vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABOT	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.46	—	—

Drawdowns

ABOT vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABOT drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABOT and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABOT	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-17.87%	-11.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-13.97%	+10.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.44%	-3.39%	-6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABOT	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.47%	36.56%	-18.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.82%	36.56%	-16.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	36.56%	-16.80%

ABOT vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABOT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABOT vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

ABOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than SGRT's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF	0.33%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.12%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABOT and SGRT in my portfolio?

ABOT and SGRT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABOT or SGRT?

On fees, ABOT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABOT or SGRT?

ABOT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABOT or SGRT?

ABOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.12% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between ABOT and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABOT and 0.59% for SGRT.